Join Tagsurance® 3 Encoding live demo webinar – Learn more and register

All blog posts

Trigger Sensors in RFID Production – Get It Right

Sep 06, 2023

In the past couple of years, I have been following several projects where the Voyantic Tagsurance systems have been integrated into production machines.  Surprisingly often, the biggest problems have been related to triggering – “seeing” accurately when a label enters the system. The experience even turned into a rule of thumb: “If something does not work correctly, first check the triggering”. I have realized that getting the triggering to work correctly is of utmost importance.

At the same time, I have been pleased to see plenty of new Tagsurance features that help to avoid challenges with triggering.  

In this article, I will discuss:

  • Why it is so critical to get triggering to work perfectly?
  • Why triggering can be difficult?
  • How do Tagsurance 3 features help get the triggering reliable?

Principle of Triggering

All (or most?) trigger sensors work with the same few simple principles:

  • Each sensor has a physical parameter it monitors. Depending on the sensor type the parameter can be the strength of light of a certain color (through a beam sensor), amount of conductive material (an inductive sensor), darkness of view (a contrast sensor), darkness and shade of color in view (a color contrast sensor), and so on.
  • The sensor has a window of view.  It only senses the parameter within this window of view.
  • The sensor is trained/programmed to recognize when the parameter passes a threshold value. For example, if a view of a contrast sensor gradually turns from white to light grey to darker greys and black in the end, the sensor is trained to see a specific point in the continuum as the threshold point.
  • At the threshold point the trigger sensor’s digital output changes from 1 to 0 (or vice versa, or the trigger sends a pulse).
A contrast sensor is designed to see the edge between light and dark areas when the edge passes the window of view. In the sample, the labels have a printed trigger mark to make the triggering easy.

Why does triggering need to be perfect?

Any problem in triggering will affect the overall quality system performance, production machine performance, and production process accuracy and efficiency. Some triggering problems are obvious, some are more subtle.

  • Missed triggers
  • Double triggers
  • Not detecting missing labels
  • Suboptimal timing
  • Suboptimal positioning

If a trigger is missed on a tag, that tag flies through the machine undetected. It would not be tested or otherwise processed. It would not be recorded in production logs. It would not be counted to output quantity. But it would be on the roll and get delivered to the customer – free of charge, of unknown quality, and probably incorrectly processed. With a high likelihood, there would be problems awaiting the customer.

A double trigger is an opposite issue. One label is counted twice and attempted to be tested and processed twice. There is a high likelihood that one or both of the process actions fail. The customer would only receive one label instead of the two that were counted.  Counts, log files, yield data, and so on would be incorrect.

In some processes, a label can be detached from the liner. Recognizing these missing labels can be important for keeping the entire process optimal. The challenge is to notice when a label does not pass the trigger sensor when expected. A bit of smartness needs to be added to the trigger signals.

In RFID label production machines, there are usually only a few milliseconds to test an individual tag. Accurate results are based on the inlay being at the right position on top of the test coupling element when the test is made.  

In this example, a label can move 7 mm on top of the Snoop Pro coupling element while being tested. With 60 m/min lane speed, this gives 7 ms of test time. If 1 mm is wasted because of suboptimal or non-consistent triggering, the test time is reduced to 6 ms (about 14.2% less time available).

Why triggering can be difficult?

The root causes for triggering difficulties vary:

  • One sensor type may not fit each produced material.
  • The “edge” may not be clear enough for the sensor in use.
  • There may be multiple edges per inlay at the path crossing the window of view.
  • When the liner moves, it may also drift across the lane, or vibrate up and down.
  • Materials have imperfections.
  • With fast-moving material, it is not easy to see the exact position of triggering – optimization is difficult.

In RFID label machines typical materials to trigger are:

  • Inlays
  • Cut labels
  • Uncut labels
Cut RFID labels

Cut labels are usually the easiest material with clear edges between the label and out of the label.  Triggering issues may arise, for example, if lighting conditions change. Glossy materials would amplify the difficulty. The issue is that the threshold position within the window of view can drift if the sensor receives a variable amount of light. If the color of the liner is close to the color of the label, detecting the edge may not work with a contrast sensor.

Uncut RFID labels. Note also material being wavy, this is a potential problem for accurate triggering.

Uncut labels without a trigger mark cannot be triggered with contrast sensors. Depending on the material a through-beam sensor or metal sensing inductive or capacitive sensor is needed.

Inlays with no single-edge trigger path (multiple edges per label).
(inlay outline from www.tageos.com)

Some inlays (antenna on a transparent liner) may not have a clear trigger path, but the trigger sensor would fire multiple times per inlay. Sometimes the antenna shapes are small compared to the window of view, in this case, even the smallest drift across a lane could be a problem.

Inlays with a clear trigger path (inlay outline from rfid.averydennison.com)

In label machines lane speeds are typically tens of meters per minute and can be even hundreds of meters per minute. At high speeds, materials start easily vibrating. If the material happens to jump when the edge is in the window of view, there is a risk of double trigger.

Voyantic Tagsurance 3 system has several built-in features that help with triggering.

The Tagsurance 3 system has features that help in avoiding typical trigger problems. When used correctly, the Tagsurance triggering is 100% reliable.

Tagsurance 3 Triggering Features

The Tagsurance 3 features that help with triggering include:

  • Support of multiple sensor types
  • Advanced pattern recognition
  • Simulated triggers
  • Visibility on trigger performance
  • Strobe light

Tagsurance 3 Supports Multiple Trigger Types

Several types of trigger sensors can be used in the Tagsurance system. All these sensors are plug-and-play compatible with the Tagsurance system.

  • Contrast sensors (grayscale or color contrast) recognize differences in color or darkness, such as the edge between a liner and a label, as long as there is a contrast difference.
  • Through-beam sensors sense changes in materials’ capability to pass light, as long as some part of the material passes light.
  • Capacitive triggering senses edges between metal and non-metal
  • Ultrasonic triggers sense differences in material thickness
Several trigger sensor types can be used in the Tagsurance 3 system.

Pattern Trigger

Pattern trigger is a feature that can always be used.  Defining a simple pattern has proven to be an efficient way to avoid double triggers regardless of the root cause. It eliminates double triggers arising from complex antenna patterns, varying light conditions, a vibrating liner, and so on.

An example of a simple pattern trigger settings.

The above picture illustrates settings defining a simple pattern. This pattern replaces a plain edge recognition, by expanding the edge. In this pattern, when the label passes the window of view of the trigger sensor, the sensor must first see 3 mm white, and then 2 mm color (trigger mark). When the defined pattern is seen, the trigger is fired at the actual edge position inside the 5 mm long pattern.

This pattern efficiently eliminates double triggers. If the trigger saw 2 edges – for example, because of liner vibrating, the pattern rule would not be met. This is when simulated triggering comes into play.

Simulated Trigger

In the above settings, the repeat length, aka pitch, is defined to be 25.01 mm, and a simulated trigger is generated after 7 mm has passed from the expected trigger position. The following actions are performed at the expected label position (and not 7 mm off).  

The trigger is simulated if the sensor doesn’t fire as expected, regardless of the reason. Reasons for not triggering could be poor-quality printed trigger marks, missing labels, lane drifting, or trigger patterns not matching the set trigger pattern conditions.

The simulated trigger feature fixes most of the issues causing the trigger sensor not to see the edge as expected.

The simulated trigger feature is also used in detecting missing labels.

Hold-off Distance

Another possibility to avoid double triggers is to set a hold-off distance. With this feature, a double trigger is discarded within the hold-off distance. For example, if a 0.5 mm hold-off distance is set, it eliminates most of the double triggers.

Hold-off distance should be used with caution when used to avoid double triggers in complex inlays.

Use hold-off distance with caution. In the example, an inlay is normally triggered on the first edge, and triggering on the second edge is avoided by setting a hold-off distance (1). But, if a trigger is missed (2), the triggering will permanently go off sync (3).

Visibility into Triggering

Tagsurance 3 system provides visibility on trigger reliability.  The trigger sensor view shows the actual repeat length as seen by the trigger sensor.

Trigger sensor view

In the above example, there is periodically one repeat that is about 0.5 mm longer than others. This 0.5 mm must be considered when optimizing the trigger position. An additional 0.5 mm safety margin must be used.

Trigger sensor view – missing label

In this example, the liner drifted and for a short period, triggers were missed. The scale of the repeat length changes for a while because of the exceptionally long trigger interval. Similarly, double triggers would be observed as exceptionally short trigger intervals.

Strobe Light

For optimizing trigger position Voyantic offers a strobe light that automatically synchronizes with trigger signals. The strobe light flashes whenever a label is in the test position. And because the human eye works as the human eye works, the strobe light shows perfectly where the label is on the coupling element when testing starts.  Optimizing trigger positioning becomes easy.

When the trigger position is adjusted in the GUI, the trigger mark shift can be observed with the help of the strobe light. (Note that the video with frame rate limitations does not do justice to the strobe light, the real-life view is even better)

Recommendations – How to Make Triggering Perfect

  1. Select a sensor type that matches the material.
  2. Use the pattern trigger feature combined with simulated triggering.
  3. Confirm reliable triggering with the trigger sensor view.
  4. Use strobe light to fine-tune the trigger position.

With the above principles, the trigger sensor will work perfectly.


See Tagsurance 3 in Action

Book an online demo

Fill in your details, and we’ll be in touch to schedule an online demo.

All blog posts
All blog posts

Why Label RF Quality Matters – Excellence in RFID

Aug 23, 2023

Summary

  • Bad RFID tag production quality = unacceptable variance in tags’ sensitivity = inconsistent performance / read ranges = unreliable RFID system performance = unhappy customers = bad for business
  • Quality can only be checked with professional RFID testing and quality control systems
  • Voyantic can help you improve design and manufacturing quality

Voyantic has published a lot of content about RFID technology, the market, and quality testing practicalities. But I wanted to understand what quality really means in RFID. And why should label converters and tag manufacturers care? Read on to find out what I learned.

Framework of RFID Tag Quality

The quality of RFID tags and labels boils down to RF performance – how consistent is the performance compared to the RFID tag specifications? RF quality cannot be seen with the human eye. Nor can the RF performance of a smart label or inlay be checked with any camera, x-ray, or machine vision. The quality can only be checked with RF (radio frequency) measurement system.

(Note: The other aspect of RFID tag quality, that will not be covered in this post, is tag data content. Learn more about tag data and encoding here: https://landing.voyantic.com/webinar-rain-rfid-encoding-for-barcode-professionals)

With that in mind, the following framework describes the levels of defining smart label RF quality, from design quality to documented production quality control: 

  1. Design Quality means fit-for-purpose
    RFID tags are designed for different use cases and applications. Good quality design means that the tag has the required performance and durability for the intended use case, taking form factor and unit cost into consideration as well. In practice, performance translates into readability and read range of the tag in the environment it was designed for: from how far the tag can be read, and from which angles, what type of items is it a good fit for?
  2. Tags can be functional but not-fit-for-purpose
    Taking a simple approach, the functionality of the tag can be checked with any reader – if the tag ID can be read, it is a functional tag. Sadly, this approach does not reveal aspects of quality, or if the tag meets the requirements or not.

    Consider an analogy to a tag functionality test from the automotive sector: at the end of a car factory line, someone only looks at and listens to the cars: “I see a car and hear the engine – Quality check ok!”
  3. RFID tester verifies that tags meet the specifications 
    A proper quality test measures the RF performance of the tag, preferably on the production line. Voyantic’s Tagsurance 3 RFID production quality control system checks the tags’ performance against pre-set criteria. The system gives a pass/fail result based on the requirements for each RFID tag passing through the system. 
  4. Knowing the production variance is the key to improving your process
    Quality testing also reveals the variance in the tested tags’ performance. The variation in the tags’ sensitivity in practice means the differences in the tags’ read range. Tag sensitivity is the measure of how much power is needed to wake up a tag. Variance is inherent to mass production – manufactured tags are never perfectly identical. Quality requirements set the acceptable variance limits for the tags’ sensitivity, ensuring they meet requirements for consistent performance, i.e., consistent readability of the tags.

    Knowing the variance is essential for internal development: for discovering good practices, and making comparisons – comparing machines, production teams, materials, settings, and so on.
  5. Customers expect proof of quality
    The highest level is to be able to prove the quality in detail. A professional quality control solution automatically records a log of all tests with the tag’s unique codes along the log data. This record can be used to prove the quality of the production batch and to prove the quality of each individual tag.
Testing in RFID inlay and label production is required to verify the produced tags meet the designed sensitivity.

Why Quality Matters…

…for the RFID system end-users?

Variation in sensitivity causes the readability of the tags to vary. Differences in tags’ read ranges lead to missed readings, and ultimately, decreased reliability of the whole RFID system.  High variation in tag sensitivity also indicates variation in durability – some tags may last longer than others. End users will not be happy to see the reliability of the RFID system decrease.

Customers expect consistency and for each tag to perform according to its datasheet information. As customers’ knowledge and experience of RFID technology increases, they also expect a documented quality program and, in some cases, require documented proof of quality from the tag supplier, and even compliance with a quality standard. 

…for manufacturing?

Quality management is the bedrock of RFID inlay and label manufacturing. A complete RFID quality control system gives visibility into the production process to catch production line issues early on before more tags start to fail, thus reducing waste and improving yield. 

The statistical quality data also enables comparing machines, production lines, and shifts. Good practices can be adopted, and poor performance can be addressed, improving the overall efficiency of production.

… for management?

A company’s top management typically focuses on the long-term growth and profitability of the company. High-quality products contribute to customer satisfaction, thus helping to drive more recurring sales revenue. Higher production yields, reduced waste, and increased production efficiency also contribute to better margins.  

The measured quality data is the basis for continuous operational improvements and long-term profitability. In practice, data enables optimizing investments: Which machines and materials work the best, and where there is room for improvement?

The Cost of Bad Quality

As the industrial scale of a company increases, the importance of good quality and reliability gets to a whole new level. Two very typical use cases for RFID are inventory tracking and supply chain management. Big brands and retailers may have hundreds of millions of items tracked and traced with RAIN RFID throughout their supply chain and retailer networks. If you consider, for example, that 1 percent of the RFID tags used to track items do not work well, that doesn’t initially sound too bad. But when you are tracking hundreds of millions of items, 1 percent translates into millions of products being lost from inventory tracking and considered stolen, wasted, or otherwise unaccounted for. 

The Experts in RFID Testing and Quality Control

Voyantic’s core business is to measure the performance of RFID tags and inlays – to help our customers make sure every delivered tag works right, and enable engineers to make better products. Our vision is that every RFID tag and label have been tested and verified in the production process with our quality control system

Get in touch to see if we can help you with your RFID projects!

Learn more:

All blog posts
All blog posts

RAIN RFID 101 for Label Converters – Webinar Recap

May 31, 2023

As the demand for RFID smart labels is growing, traditional label converters are increasingly getting questions from their customers about adding RFID to their label products. 

Label converters that are just starting with RFID or considering it, need to first educate themselves on the fundamentals of the technology and what is involved in producing RFID labels. We decided to host a webinar to help with this first step.

Watch the webinar recording ›

Or read a summary of the main points below.

RFID Market is THE Market to Be In

The RAIN RFID market is developing in terms of volume, value, and diversity. Big retailer mandates, such as the Walmart mandate, also have an effect on driving growth on the retailer side, creating opportunities and challenges for the players in the market. Likely, your first RFID label customer will not be your last one. 

The webinar focused on the basics of RAIN RFID specifically in the context of label converting in the retail industry: what are the key aspects that a label converter needs to consider when adding an RFID inlay into labels, turning them into RFID labels? 

The webinar also touched on data standards and data encoding. Knowledge of encoding and different data standards is the key to preventing tag clutter which can be an issue in the RFID industry, but also to enabling the use of the item’s digital identity throughout its lifecycle. For example, the same RFID tag can potentially be used in various different applications from logistics management, and inventory tracking in the store, to customer self-checkout, and customer experience applications. 

There are a lot of great resources available for the basics of  RAIN RFID technology, its applications, and its unique benefits. If you are a RAIN RFID beginner, https://www.rainrfid.org is a great place to start.

How to Approach the Increased RFID Label Demand?

The typical steps that label converters need to take to get into the RFID label business include:

  • Acquiring information and knowledge
  • Expanding supplier and partner networks
  • Upgrading different production machinery for RAIN RFID
  • Investing in dedicated RAIN RFID production machinery

The first step always is to acquire information. What does your customer need and is there a mandate or any other requirements documentation that you need to familiarize yourself with? What is the format of the label that is needed; a sticker, a hangtag, or a prime label? What kind of data is needed for the label, both printed and encoded? 

You will also need to learn essential information about RFID technology and RF-specific considerations for the label production process. Inhouse expertise on RFID and any applicable mandates is highly recommended, in addition to finding the right partners. An in-house expert enables you to become a value-added supplier to your customer to navigate through new requirements from their retail customer. 

Read on to get started with the first step. 

 You can recognize an RFID label by an RFID or EPC emblem mark on the label or hang tag. EPC stands for electronic product code.

What do you need to know about RFID inlays?

One of the core components of an RFID label is an inlay, which consists of an antenna on a substrate and an IC (chip) glued on top of the antenna. This process creates dry inlays. Dry inlays do not have an adhesive layer.  

A term you often hear related to retail label mandates is white wet inlay, also known as a “sticker”. A sticker refers to a blank RFID inlay that has adhesive and liner layers and a simple white facestock. A sticker can be applied directly to an item.  

  • Dry inlays: no self-adhesive layer in the inlay. I.e. it is not a sticker
  • Wet inlays: an inlay in a sticker format with an adhesive and liner layers, and it can be directly applied on top of an item without additional converting process
  • White we inlay aka Sticker: an inlay in a sticker format with adhesive and liner layers, and a white facestock

Overview of the RFID Manufacturing Process

RFID label converting includes unique requirements and considerations for the converting process. Before going into the converting process, it is essential to have at least a high-level understanding of the entire RFID manufacturing process and how converting relates to the process. 

  1. Without going into component manufacturing (IC, antenna, liner materials, etc.) the first step in the process is chip attachment (aka IC bonding)  where the IC is attached to an antenna to form an uncut dry inlay. There are specialized manufacturing companies that focus on IC attachment to produce inlays.
  2. Next, the uncut dry inlays are converted in one or more process steps into labels:  material layers, and adhesives are added, and labels are cut into white labels, aka stickers. This simplified process is just one option and there are a lot of different processes for RFID label converting, depending on the type of label and use case. 
  3. After converting, data needs to be added to the blank label. This process is called personalization and can sometimes be done on the same label-converting line. Data is encoded into the labels to give them a unique serial number that can be read with RAIN RFID readers. Personalization also includes printing human-readable data and information on labels. 

The last step of the process is attaching the ready label to an item, and turning it into a tagged item.

For a converting company, the business opportunity is anywhere between dry-cut inlays and personalization. This strategic decision impacts the label manufacturing process changes and machinery investments that are needed.

Retail RFID Mandate Data Terminology

One of the growth drivers for RFID labels is coming from the big retailers mandating the use of RFID for their suppliers. There are some basic terms you need to be aware of, specifically related to the retail mandate landscape.  

When your existing customer is asking for RFID labels for item identification, in terms of data, you will need to convert the products’ UPC / EAN / GTIN barcode number to an RFID encoding and add a serial number. The combination (barcode number + serial number) is a unique EPC, which is the GS1 term for an RFID-encoded number and stands for Electronic Product Code. 

Source: https://site.gs1us.org/rfid-creating-epc.html

The retail world has traditionally focused on using barcodes to identify the product type (stock keeping unit, aka SKU), for example, a 5 lb bag of flour or a 1 gallon of milk. This is now changing into having a unique identifier for every single item. By adding a serial number to the product label, you don’t just know the product type, but exactly which individual product package it is. This naturally requires that every single serial number is unique. You should always use official RFID tag data standards/numbering schemes. 

One term that comes across in the retail mandates is “permalock”. Permalocking the encoded RFID data means that users cannot change the data. RFID tag data can also be “locked”, but locked data can be re-written with a password. Permalocking the tag data is required in most retail mandates. 

  • UPC = EAN = GTIN = barcode number
  • EPC = GS1 term for RFID-encoded number
    • EPC or ISO RFID logo is usually required to be printed on the labels to indicate to consumers that the label includes an RFID tag
  • SGTIN-96 = Encoding scheme that includes GTIN and the serial number. The number 96 refers to the number of bits in the tag chip where the information is encoded
  • Permalock = RFID encoded data is permanently locked so that users cannot change (re-write) the data

How to Get Started

In short, you can get started with the following steps

  1. Source inlays
  2. Get machinery to insert/laminate RFID inlay on a sticker or a prime label
  3. Add quality control
  4. Find out if encoding is required. If yes, get encoding equipment and data models

Inlay Selection

In some cases, the mandate specifies the type of inlays that can be used. If the inlays are not specified by mandates, often there are de-facto inlays that are being used in particular industries and applications. Inlays specified in the mandates are selected through quality certification processes. 

Auburn University ARC certification program works closely with big retailers to establish quality standards and performance requirements for inlays in various applications and environments. Those requirements are defined in requirement Specs maintained by ARC. The ARC program tests inlays against the requirements in the Spec, defining and listing which inlays are approved for that Spec.  

Retailers can check which inlay Spec applies to different product categories and which inlays are approved to meet the performance requirements for that Spec. 

Source: https://rfid.auburn.edu/walmartspec/

However, not all retailers use the ARC specifications. Some have in-house specifications and documentation that specify which inlays are accepted. 

Most mandates define the dimensions of the finalized RFID labels and specify the performance of the inlays by referring to the ARC categories.  Typically there are multiple options for inlays that meet the requirements available. An important consideration is to take the converting machine capabilities into account; 

  • what size rolls can be used in the machine, 
  • what should the roll core diameter be, 
  • should the inlays be cut or uncut, 
  • do you need dry or wet inlays, etc? 

These practical considerations may limit the selection of possible inlays and their delivery format. 

Other considerations for inlay sourcing may include pricing, delivery terms, and schedules, support availability from the inlay supplier, available quality data of the inlays, etc. 

Label Approval

Next, you need to figure out the label type required by your customer. There are different types of RFID labels, prime labels, hang tags, and stickers. RFID tags can also be embedded into the product or packaging. In retail, a sticker, which is an RFID label with a simple white facestock, has become a common way to add RFID to products. The retail mandates may also define requirements for the sticker facestock and adhesive materials. 

A typical RFID sticker on a product packaging

Next, your customer needs to have the finished label go through an approval process in which the retailer can verify that the labels are encoded properly, contain all the required printed information, and are positioned properly on the product. Auburn University’s ARC program covers the label approval process for most retailers. Not all retailers go through the ARC program, however, they may also have their own internal approval process.

Another term you may run into is GS1 TIPP, which stands for Tagged Item Performance Protocol. In the TIPP approach, instead of testing tags or inlays, the testing is done with the item that is already tagged with RFID. TIPP is used for some mandates in Europe and its use is also increasing in North America, especially for the use of food and pharmaceuticals. 

RAIN RFID Production Machinery – Upgrade or invest in new?

RFID inlays are a layer of materials. If a converting machine has an insertion capability or a laminating capability and a die-cut station, those machines can typically also be used for inserting RFID inlays. But there are a few considerations to keep in mind. 

For dry inlays that don’t have any material on top of the IC, ESD (electrostatic discharge) protection and tension control should be considered. A common reason for IC malfunction is either too loose or too high tension for the inlay roll. If the roll is too loose, it can slip and break off the IC. If the roll is too tight and there is too much tension, it may crack the IC or IC connection. A proper quality control system is the only way to know if something is going wrong in the process. Real-time visibility of each label’s performance allows adjusting the process parameters as soon as problems are detected, eliminating waste and re-runs. If a machine has some kind of tension control or some kind of ESD protection, typically that also works for RFID. Wet inlays with material protecting the IC and antenna, are well protected against tension and ESD.

The other option is to invest in new RFID-specialized converting machines. This may become an option to consider as you grow your customer base and you need to scale the production. The good news is that there are options and expertise available to help you with your choices.

Add Quality Control

Inlays are not continuous material, which makes position control critical. The inlay must be in a consistent position inside the label, and must not be cut or perforated. 

Quality control for RFID labels differs greatly from quality control for traditional labels. Unlike barcodes, which can be verified and checked visually, RF performance cannot be seen. An RFID label that works well usually looks exactly like a label that does not work as specified.  

The RF performance of the label needs to be tested to make sure it works within set performance requirements. An RFID tag may be readable, but the performance may not be good enough causing variation in the read range that is not acceptable for the intended use case. Read range is the distance that a tag can be detected with a reader. In other words, a tag may be readable in the production line in close proximity, but may not work when attached to an item and read with a handheld reader from a few meters apart in an inventory count. 

Monitoring the performance of the tags is not complicated. It can be done in the production line at full production speeds, checking that every label on the line meets the specified performance requirements. The quality testing system brings visibility into the process, making sure you also catch any issues early on in the production run. 

Encoding Equipment

RFID labels can be encoded either inline with encoding equipment integrated into the converting machine, with specialized roll-to-roll encoding machines, or using RFID printers. For large volumes, the ideal would be to encode inline and at high speed. RFID printers can be used as a temporary solution for larger volumes, short-run service bureau jobs and for low- to mid-volume stickers and prime labels that can be accommodated in a printer. 

Stay Tuned for the Next Webinar

If you made it through to the end of this post, you might be interested to hear that we are planning a follow-up webinar that will dive deeper into the RFID label converting process. You can help us plan the content and make it more relevant to your needs by sending over any questions or suggestions related to the topic.  (email: marketing@voyantic.com)

And make sure you’ll get the webinar invitation by signing up for our blog updates → 

All blog posts
All blog posts

Product Highlight: What’s New with Tagsurance 3

Apr 19, 2023

It has been almost a year since the Tagsurance 3 launch. So we thought it was about time to report what we’ve been up to with Tagsurance 3 product development and tell a bit more about the product vision and next steps.

I summarized the new features since the launch below. These are made based on customer feedback, our learnings from the market and to enable robust industrial-scale quality control on most production lines.

We are committed to providing the best quality control solution for  RAIN RFID production lines from chip attachment and label converting to offline reel-to-reel, and even for tagged items. Our focus is on creating a fast, reliable, scalable, future-proof, and modern quality testing solution that is also easy to integrate.

We will continue full-steam ahead on this track.

We are also working on RAIN encoding. It will be a feature in Tagsurance 3 so the same well-known platform, same team, and same ambition will soon cover RAIN encoding as well. The encoding feature can be upgraded to your current or future Tagsurance 3 installations. More information on the release schedule and specifications will follow.

Oh, and almost forgot to mention that Tagsurance 3 version 3.5 was just released, see the details here: https://voyantic.com/download/tagsurance-3-download-page/tagsurance-3-5-0-download-page/ 

IO signals to the production machine based on yield

This feature brings the possibility to give a digital IO signal to the machine or LED signal tower based on low yield or consecutive failed tags. Here are a few examples:

  • the yield of current lot/job per lane or across lanes, e.g. lot yield < 99.21 %
  • the yield of a “window”, e.g.
    • last 400 tags < 99.1 %
  • can be used to stop at n consecutive failed tags;
    • set window size to match wanted “max consecutive fails”
    • set yield percentage (X) as follows: 0 < X < 1 / [windows size] * 100

Telemetry visible in operator UI

This feature shows lane speed and distance traveled since the job start. You can also trigger sensor-related data in real time:

  • pattern correlation if the pattern in use
  • pitch measured based on trigger

IO only station

The IO-only station feature is useful for integrating, for example, a machine vision system for visual quality check or a similar test device that is either triggered by itself or by Tagsurance 3.

The IO-only station works like any other station with the exception that no data connection, no initialization by Tagsurance 3, and no results as data (only pass/fail) in Tagsurance 3.

Job configuration in one place

All configuration items (recipe, lot, trigger settings, and action triggers) needed for a job are now in a single modal and easy to manage.

Lane Configurator is now part of the operator UI

The machine IO and Locations settings have been moved to Lane Configurator as well, putting them all logically in the same place.

TAL15k support “RS-232 tester interface”

Tagsurance 3 can be now used with the Mühlbauer TAL15k machines with either one or two testers. The latest version provides full support for the TAL15k including operator UI and a real-time view of how the testing progresses in the testing area.

If your TAL15k has the “RS-232 tester interface” enabled (we will help you to find this out) then Tagsurance 3 can be integrated to TAL15k machines very easily, just by connecting the RS-232 from the machine and changing the coupling elements to Voyantic Snoop Pro.

Strobe light (LED) available as an accessory for easy trigger adjustment

The strobe comes with a short adapter cable and it is connected between the “Station IO cable” and the “Station”.

Snoop Pro shielding plate collection has grown significantly

Snoop Pro 1.0 and Snoop Pro Mini 2.0 have now a large collection of shielding plates available to purchase to avoid compromising lane speed and/or testing accuracy. New plates also have the type and opening size engraved on them for ease of use. 

Notes on the terminology:

  • The length of the shielding plate opening is always the opening dimension in material movement
  • The width of the shielding plate opening is always the opening dimension perpendicular to material movement
  • Snoop Pro 1.0 selection:
    • 70 mm width – lengths from 24 to 60 mm in 2 mm steps
    • 90 mm width – lengths from 20 to 60 mm in 2 mm steps
    • 115 mm width – lengths from 24 to 60 mm in 2 mm steps
  • Snoop Pro Mini 2.0 selection:
    • 60 mm width – lengths from 16 to 60 mm in 2 mm steps
    • 80 mm width – lengths from 16 to 60 mm in 2 mm steps
All blog posts
All blog posts

Best Practices for RAIN RFID Label Quality Testing

Jul 26, 2022

RAIN RFID, aka UHF RFID aka EPC RFID, is the technology used in connecting billions of everyday items to the Internet. In 2020 RAIN RFID tag volumes exceeded 21 billion, and in 2021 volumes reached over 28 billion. We are seeing this strong growth continue. As a result, huge amounts of new production capacity will be needed, which means that 

  • more machines are needed,
  • single-lane machines need to be converted into multilane machines, and
  • machine lane speeds must be increased.

At the same time, RAIN RFID users have started to pay more attention to their RFID label quality.

In this article, I will share Voyantic’s experiences and views on RAIN RFID quality testing:

  • What is essential in planning quality testing in RAIN RFID label manufacturing?
  • What are the current best practices in RFID quality testing?

What does good manufacturing quality mean for RAIN RFID tags?

At the very basic level, the good manufacturing quality of RAIN RFID tags could be defined as: “Manufactured RAIN RFID tags are not defective.” This definition is easily understandable, but it does not offer much practical help. In fact, it is misleading.  Sometimes “not defective” is interpreted as “can be read”, and that leads to problems. When RAIN tags start to break, their read range gradually decreases and, only at the very end, the tags become entirely unreadable. 

A better definition of good RAIN RFID manufacturing quality is: “Manufactured RAIN RFID tags’ sensitivities are within set variation limits”. This definition is a bit more technical, but let’s break it down:

  • Tag sensitivity describes how much power is needed for waking up a tag. Tag sensitivity is at the background of all practical performance features. For example, if a tag’s read range has changed, also its sensitivity has changed. If a tag’s orientation pattern (read range in different angles) has changed, also the sensitivity has changed. If a tag’s response strength (backscatter) has changed, the sensitivity has also changed. Shortly – any change in a tag’s performance can be seen as a change in the tag’s sensitivity. Or the other way around – if the sensitivities of two individual tags of a model are the same, they will perform similarly in every way.
  • Variation refers to consistency. Tag designs are different. Some tags are designed to have lower sensitivity (shorter read range) than others. The consistency of the performance within a tag model is important for the users. 
  • Within set limits implies that there are limits, but offers some freedom for setting the criteria. Some applications require exact read ranges – an item moving past a reader on a conveyer belt may require read ranges within some centimeters. Shorter range causes missed reads, and a longer range would risk stray readings – reading unwanted items that are not on the belt but nearby. Some applications have a higher tolerance, and a read range variation of a couple of meters may not be a problem.

RAIN RFID manufacturing quality is good when “Manufactured RAIN RFID tags’ sensitivities are within set variation limits”. This definition also works from a practical point of view.

What does the RF performance of RAIN RFID tags mean?

From a practical point of view, the RF performance of a RAIN RFID tag defines 

  • how far the tag is readable
  • at different angles
  • when the tag is attached to an item.

In tag datasheets, these are commonly described with graphs.

  • An orientation pattern shows how well a tag can be read when it points to a reader from different angles.
  • A threshold curve shows the tag sensitivity – how much power is needed to wake up the tag at different frequencies. A version of the threshold curve may show read range instead of power. 
Picture: Threshold sweep and orientation graphs from Tageos EOS-500 datasheet

Good quality manufacturing produces tags that have consistently similar orientation patterns and threshold curves. The good news for manufacturers is that full measurement is not needed to check that the tags are similar to each other. In fact, this can be checked with minimal test procedures.

How should RAIN RFID tag quality be tested in manufacturing?

It should be kept in mind that one method does not fit everyone. However, RAIN RFID industry seems to be converging towards the following methodology. 

These are the current best practices:

  1. Far-field performance of the tag is tested
  2. Test recipe that separates good and bad tags efficiently
  3. Cross reading is reliably prevented

These best practices may seem simple and obvious, but there are details to consider. Let’s look at these key points in detail.

1. Far-field performance of the tag is tested

In production machines tags are close to each other. Close proximity reading is needed for preventing cross-reading, and for practical reasons. At the same time, a quality test needs to address the far-field performance of the tag. A common near-field antenna cannot be used. Voyantic has solved this close proximity vs. far-field conflict with the patented Snoop Pro antenna concept. This unique antenna requires the tag to use its far-field properties in close proximity.

2. Test recipe that separates good and bad tags efficiently

Separating good and bad tags is an obvious requirement. But how to do it efficiently, at production speeds, when tags fly over the antenna at high speeds? A current best practice test recipe is often referred to as the “three-point test” or “3-point test”. The three-point test recipe includes 

  • testing the tag at three different frequencies across a wide frequency band (hence the 3-point test name)
  • checking that the tag sensitivities are within 3 dB from each other (+/- 1.5 dB)
  • checking that the tag’s EPC code can be inventoried

This is how the test recipe is created:

  • A good starting point is to set test frequencies to 820 MHz, 950 MHz, and 1080 Mhz
  • Adjust one of the points to match the tags’ lower resonance frequency
  • If possible, adjust another frequency to match with the tags’ upper resonance frequency. 
  • select third frequency so that the frequency spread is at least 100 MHz
  • at least one of the points should be an inventory test (for reading EPC)
  • at least one of the frequencies should be a sensitivity test, with 3dB between upper and lower limits
  • the power level for the points should be set so that tag sensitivity in each point is within 3 dB, or +/- 1.5 dB 

Considering the recipe, this 3-point test could be described as the current industry best practice.

Picture: 3-point test recipe as seen in the Tagsurance recipe builder

In the sample tag (above graph)  both resonance frequencies (868 MHz and 995 MHz) are in the available frequency range. The sensitivity test is set to the lower resonance frequency and the point test is set to the upper resonance frequency. Because the frequency spread is over 100 MHz, the third frequency is set in between. An inventory test is set to this frequency. 

In the above picture, the curve is a median performance tag’s threshold sensitivity curve (reference).

Shows sensitivity test frequency and power range, in addition, a 3 dB range is set for the acceptance criteria. the frequency is set to the lower resonance frequency.

Shows the point test frequency and power. The power level is set 1.5 dB above the threshold of a median performance tag.

Shows the Inventory test frequency and power (for reading EPC/UII code).

3. Prevent cross-reading

Cross-reading occurs when one tag is thought to be read, but in fact, data comes from another, nearby tag.

In normal use, RAIN RFID tags are inventoried. They are read with a speed of more than a hundred tags per second. Testing production quality is different. Tags are tested one at a time, and it is critical to be sure that the results are from the right tag, even if another tag is just millimeters away. And to add to the complexity, all has to happen while the tags move at high speeds across the antenna. 

Voyantic’s Snoop Pro antenna concept includes a method for completely preventing cross-readings. The antenna concept includes a shielding plate with dimensions matched to the inlay’s antenna and repeat length dimensions. This solution assures that cross-readings do not occur.

In addition to the above comments, 2 more notes can be added from the manufacturing point of view.

4. Speed

Production is about the combination of speed, capacity, and quality. Quality testing UHF RFID tags should not be the bottleneck for production. If any machine output needs to be limited because of quality testing, this would add to the cost of quality.

Voyantic Tagsurance 3 system is designed for high-speed production lines, for continuous production use. 

5. Automation

RAIN RFID tags are manufactured in volumes in different machines. Production runs are in millions, and any sample testing is not possible in practice. A common requirement is that tags of unknown quality are not accepted, this forces testing to cover 100% of the manufactured tags. 

The testing must be automated and integrated into the manufacturing machine. 

Voyantic Tagsurance 3 system can be easily integrated into any machine. 

Are there quality standards or specifications to follow? What about quality certifications?

Common quality standards and practices such as ISO9000 series standards and six sigma can be applied to RAIN RFID. However, these standards do not offer practical advice on acceptable quality limits. 

Exact quality limits have emerged within the RAIN RFID industry. The above-mentioned three-point test and tag sensitivity variation within 3dB is a commonly accepted good practice.

ARC RFID lab is offering quality certification for UHF RFID / RAIN RFID inlay manufacturers as a part of their tag certification program. Correctly implemented three-point test using Voyantic Tagsurace system meets these requirements.

The 3dB variation and three-point testing cannot be used every time – adjustments may be needed. The quality requirements arise from the RAIN RFID / UHF RFID users’ consistency requirements. If an RFID user needs very tight read range tolerances, a smaller variation limit may be needed, and in some cases, wider tolerances may be perfect for the customer. 

Learn more about the Tagsurance 3 System

On-Demand Webinar: RAIN RFID 101 for Label Converters

Watch the 60-minute crash course on RFID essentials

Why are your customers talking about RFID now?  What specifically is RAIN RFID? How can you get going? What do you need to consider to avoid claims and rework?

All blog posts
All blog posts

Voyantic Releases Tagsurance® 3 – The Next-Generation Quality Testing Solution for RAIN RFID and NFC Manufacturing

Jun 28, 2022

Tagsurance 3 Brings Accurate High-Speed Inline Testing into UHF and HF Tag Production to Meet the Growing Needs of the RFID Industry

Today Voyantic is releasing the next-generation solution for RAIN RFID and NFC tag production testing and quality control. Voyantic Tagsurance 3 system brings full visibility into the quality of tags in the production line, ensuring tags meet the designed performance features, without slowing down the production process. The Tagsurance 3 System allows, for example, three-point testing at high speeds, with accurate measurement results.

Tagsurance 3 is a complete solution including the Tagsurance Controller rack for triggering, sequencing, REST API, and operator UI, as well as measurement devices, antennas, cabling, trigger, and rotary encoder. The Tagsurance 3 Controller is ready to be used out-of-the-box. The operator UI is browser-based and easy to use.

The system is designed to be easily installed into various machine types; small and large machines, high-speed machines, chip attachment machines, and converting machines. The system is modular and scales to various production volume needs from 1 to 8 lanes with 1-5 stations per lane, handling lane speeds up to 200 meters per minute.

The new Tagsurance system is the next-generation version of the time-tested, trusted, and accurate quality testing system Voyantic introduced to the industry. In the new system, the hardware, the software, and the technology stack have been upgraded and modernized.

The first version of Tagsurance brought UHF quality testing into tag manufacturing machines. Tagsurance 2 expanded the capabilities into HF quality testing.

“The new Tagsurance 3 is designed to meet the growing demands of the RFID industry. The new system can in many cases handle around twice the speeds for RAIN testing than before, without compromising measurement accuracy. Our goal is to deliver the best performance and make sure the system works reliably for our customers,” says Jussi Nykänen, Director of Production Solutions at Voyantic.

Learn more about the new Tagsurance 3 System ›

WEBINAR
Introducing Tagsurance 3 – The Next-Generation Quality Assurance Solution for High-Speed RFID Tag Production Lines

Date & Time:
Thursday, July 7, 2022
2 pm EEST / 1 pm CEST

Join the Tagsurance 3 product demonstration webinar to learn all about the new system.

All blog posts
All blog posts

Webinar Series for Barcode Pros – Getting Started with RFID Labels

Feb 01, 2022

Last year, we teamed up with TSC Printronix Auto ID and started a webinar series designed for barcode professionals, who are considering expanding their offering to RAIN RFID labels, or who already are at the beginning of that journey. With TSC Printronix Auto ID we saw the need for education as more and more barcode label customers are looking for RFID solutions. 

In the first webinar, What a barcode professional needs to know about RAIN RFID Label and Tag Data, we started from the basics: what are the key aspects of RAIN RFID technology and data, how does RAIN RFID actually work, what are the system components, and most importantly, where can you find more information. 

The second part of the webinar series, What a Barcode Professional Needs to Know about the RAIN RFID Encoding Processes, focused on the practicalities of the RAIN RFID encoding process, equipment, and alternatives. 

In the third webinar, What a Barcode professional needs to know about RAIN RFID label selection and sourcing, scheduled for February 10th, we will cover the most important considerations related to label selection and sourcing process including label specifications, supplier selection, delivery format, handling, and other issues.

Here are my main takeaways from the first two webinars in the series.

Key Takeaways from Part 1 

It is crucial to understand filtering in the context of RFID systems

The nature of RF signals means that they can go through walls and various other materials. A RAIN RFID reader can read a large number of tags simultaneously and without a line of sight, which is, in comparison, required for reading barcodes. For example, when you are inventorying tagged items in storage, your system could be reading tags behind a wall that should not be included in your inventory. Setting up tag filtering correctly ensures that your application works accurately, and that requires following proper data encoding processes. 

There are 9 RFID tags on the wall, but the reader found 54 tags.

There is no “one size fits for all” RAIN tag

What do you need to know about RAIN RFID tags when looking for a tag for your customer? The difference between a barcode label and an RFID label is that the RFID label includes an IC (microchip) and an antenna. Together the IC and the antenna make up an RFID inlay. There are lots of different IC models out there and the type of IC defines what kind of and how much data can be encoded in the tag. The antenna model defines how far the label can be read. Knowing your solution requirements, physical factors such as the label size and item materials, and use cases and data requirements are necessary for finding the best tag for your solution.

Do not use a proprietary numbering system

Keeping the importance of filtering in mind, it is crucial to understand the basics of RAIN RFID encoding systems, i.e., how you are putting data into a tag. There are three data standard families available for RAIN RFID tag encoding

Following one of the established data standards ensures there won’t be issues with tag filtering (and application errors) along the road.

The fourth option is to use your own proprietary encoding systems – Please do not do it! Or if you do, you need to “wrap” your system within the ISO standard or the RAIN numbering system.

Selecting the data standard to use often depends on your customer or the industry you are operating in. Some customers may mandate that you use a specific standard, and many industries have a mandated or de-facto standard in use to ensure interoperability.

Above are my key learnings of Part 1, but many more topics and details were discussed. Watch the webinar to learn more about each of the data standard families, including the structure of the different numbering systems and example use cases, as well as the basics of data security. Webinar part two dives deeper into the standard selection process and the specific advantages of the different standards.

Key Takeaways from Part 2

Label Manufacturing Process

The label manufacturing process includes three steps. In the first step, the IC is attached to the antenna, creating an inlay. In the second step, the inlays are converted in a common backing material called a liner, creating a blank label. In the third step, data is printed on and encoded into the label, creating a finished label.

While the process itself is simple, the manufacturing machines are quite complex. Watch the webinar to learn more ›

Encoding Equipment Types and Process

The suitable type of encoding equipment depends on the volume of tags that need to be encoded. The more sophisticated machines that can process high volumes at high speed naturally come with a higher cost.

An RFID reader can be used as an encoder but it is not an efficient permanent solution.

An RFID printer is purpose-built for encoding and is best suitable for small rolls and batches. They can be affordable and process up to some thousands of labels per hour.

High throughput personalization machines can take in larger rolls and process up to one hundred thousand tags per hour, but they also come with a higher cost.

And finally, encoding can also be integrated into product production or packaging lines.

Watch the webinar recording to dive deeper into the IC selection factors, encoding process steps, RAIN tag memory details, as well as tag locking and passwords – ensuring the right data is encoded in the right way.

The Personalization Process

The personalization process includes both printing data on the label and encoding the tags. The printed data can be the same data that’s in the RFID tag or include additional information. 

High throughput personalization lines often process labels in successive stations. Combining the print and encoding in a high-speed personalization process requires accurate triggering for all the steps and making sure the stations match the process flow.

An example of personalization stations in a high throughput personalization process.

Using an RFID printer for personalization is a good option for smaller-scale projects. An RFID printer prints the barcode and other designed details on the label as well as encodes and verifies the RAIN tag data.

Part 3: RAIN RFID Tag Selection and Sourcing

Learn the most important aspects of label selection and sourcing, including label specifications, supplier selection, and delivery format.

All blog posts
All blog posts

RAIN RFID on Label Processing Machines: An Overview to Help with Your Choices

Oct 28, 2021

Traditional label producers entering the RAIN RFID business are faced with strategic and practical questions:

In this third blog of the series created with NXP® Semiconductors, we specifically address production machinery. Read on to learn about the machine types, what approaches to consider, and how to avoid pitfalls that would cost you time, money, and nerves.

A picture of Tagsurance 3 software in action.

Quality Control for RFID Label Production Lines

Many variables in the RFID inlay and label production processes affect the RF performance of the finished product. Voyantic provides the industry-standard quality inspection systems for measuring the RF performance every tag on the production line.

Yes, There Is a Growing Market!

RAIN RFID adoption is growing at an unprecedented rate; with those markets that have already seen the benefits of the technology, such as retail and automotive, continuing their adoption. Other markets are emerging, for example parcel services, which is driven by the e-commerce boom.

Majority of these applications are based on RAIN enabled labels being added to the item. If you are already supplying labels to consumable products, the day will come when your customer asks you to add the RAIN labels on your supply program.

It Is Easy to Get Started with Outsourced Inlays

If you already have the ability to produce labels, adding RAIN RFID inlay on the backside of your current products would be one easy way to get started. You will need a capable inlay vendor, and you will need to teach the basics of RAIN RFID to your sales and production staff. Investments required to upgrade your current machines are modest, and inlay vendors are easy to find.

As you learn and build your customer base, it is possible later to expand your business also to cover the inlay part. At that point you will likely need to do a few new hires for development and production, as well as make investments on new machinery – the stakes become higher.

Manufacturing Process is No Magic

The manufacturing process of smart labels follows quite a standardized flow, as in the picture below. While some companies cover most of the process steps in-house, other manufacturers have assumed a more networked business model. Traceability across processes is a tremendous asset for failure root cause analysis, which is one cornerstone for enabling continuous improvement in any organization.

The three essential machine types that you should become familiar with are presented in the next picture:

Let’s understand these machine types and some of the related choices.

The IC Attach Machine Is Where the Inlay Quality is Achieved

The main technologies are flip-chip, and direct die attach. The RAIN IC placement on the dipole antenna requires high precision. Precision, combined with high line speed and sophisticated mount pressure control, makes the IC placement head the most expensive subassembly of the whole machine. You should make sure that the placement head is compatible with current and future RAIN IC’s.

As you look at the machines, you will quickly realize that the number of lanes in the machines varies. Multilane machines typically have higher throughput than single-lane machines, at the expense of added machine complexity. On the positive side, a multilane machine does not need that high line speed to reach an impressive throughput, which may lead to a more straightforward technical construction on the IC placement head. If you’re focusing on bulk, go with a multilane system.

A single lane IC attach machine is less complicated and thus easier to operate. It’s also easier to configure for new antenna models, making it better suited for smaller production runs. The capital investment is also lower.

Three Topologies of Converting Machines

In label converting, different material layers are added on top or under the inlay. There may also be cutting and testing involved. Converting machinery is more versatile, but three separate machine families can be found:

You can have a single lane machine that runs in a continuous mode very fast. Alternatively, you have a multilane machine running slower, and even in intermittent mode. At the end of such a machine, you may have a cutting and slitting module to separate single reels from a web.

A third approach, especially for traditional label suppliers, is to start with an industrial press, and add an inlay insertion section on the machine. An outcome is a multilane machine running in continuous mode.

Personalization Makes Labels Unique

Personalization focuses on getting the data right. Data on the tag is stored both in optical and electrical forms. Therefore, most personalization machines handle both printing and RFID encoding.

While that may sound trivial, managing the data, performing all the needed data conversions correctly, and keeping all the process peripherals in sync is easier said than done. When process speed increases, you will need to pay more attention to details, such as triggering. When working with variable data, you should make sure the optical markings match the unique identifier encoded in the RAIN IC.

Got Machines Already? Consider a Retrofit

It is often possible to retrofit the needed RAIN RFID peripherals on an existing production machine. With a low capital expenditure and a short lead time you’re able to pursue your first RAIN projects.

Voyantic delivers solutions to control sub processes, manage the data between the processes and keep both data and sub processes in sync. We also offer transferable bolt-on alternatives. Such frames come complete with the needed sensors, cabling and antennas, and won’t require changes on the signaling of your current machine.

You don’t need to figure all these details out. Let our experts talk with your machine vendor, and come up with a proposal!

Contact us


On-Demand Webinar:

Quality Management Approaches in RAIN RFID and NFC Manufacturing

Hear industry experts share their experiences in RFID tag manufacturing and quality management. The webinar includes case examples and presentations on how to set quality goals, which standards are relevant, and best practices for quality testing — from setting up the quality program to managing the day-to-day activities.

Watch now

All blog posts
All blog posts

Smart Label Durability – Bring Facts to the Table

Aug 18, 2021

When there is a need to increase smart label production volumes, it can be done by adding new machinery, more lanes to existing machinery, or by increasing production speeds. All these methods are in use, and they are combined frequently. For example, new production machines have more lanes and higher lane speeds.

At Voyantic, we are seeing that increasing lane speeds combined with smart label component development has put durability testing into the spotlight. In this article, I analyze the reasons behind the increased interest in smart label durability testing, and I will share the basics of the test methodology.

Why is the interest in durability testing increasing?

I believe that part of the increased interest can be seen as a healthy sign of technology maturation and market growth. RAIN RFID and NFC just work. Technology suppliers do not have to fight with the basic functionality and the focus is shifting to scalability. Outside of some special use cases, durability has been taken as given.

Let’s have a look at the drivers that are now challenging label durability.

Decreasing IC sizes

The latest generation of RAIN tag ICs is becoming smaller. When ICs are getting smaller, a natural question is what happens to the connection between the IC, the antenna, and the liner. And what is the effect on the inlay durability?

The latest generation of RAIN tag ICs is becoming smaller

The transition from plastic to paper-based labels

Due to ecological aspects, paper is used increasingly as label base material. The “stickiness” of antennas and ICs to paper is different compared to a plastic liner. Paper also stretches and bends differently than PET.

All paper is not just paper, but different additives and fillers are used to create different properties. All these properties, whiteness, polishing, and so on, may affect how the antenna and IC stick to the paper. Finally, add humidity as an environmental variable, and the durability of the paper-based label needs to be studied for sure.

Faster IC attach processes and new bonding epoxies

IC attach machine speeds keep on increasing and the machine vendors are working their way towards 100,000 UPH. The stress to an inlay with a freshly attached IC is higher when lane speeds increase. There is also less time to cure the bonding glues, which has led to new glues being introduced. These new glues require less time to cure, but may need higher curing temperatures. Again, a question about durability comes up: How to fine-tune the bonding process so that the label durability is not compromised?

Faster converting machines

Converting process speeds are also increasing. Higher machine speeds stress the inlays and labels. An obvious worst-case to avoid would be inlays starting to break already during the converting process. Do the inlays survive intact through these fast processes?

Label type NFC tags

Traditionally a label has been one of the major RAIN RFID tag formats. NFC tags have been made more as smart cards, various key fobs, and other more rigid formats. Lately, NFC label production has also started to grow. This extends the label durability question from RAIN RFID to also NFC. Are NFC labels also durable enough to survive through the label life cycle?

All the above changes are happening in parallel. The combined outcome is what matters. Are the inlays durable with all the new materials, components, and processes?

Standard durability test method

Test principles

The basic principle of durability testing is to compare a meaningful parameter before and after a stress, and to analyze the results to determine whether the stress creates unwanted consequences. Because the tags under testing are stressed, potentially to the point of breaking them, the method cannot be used for testing every individual tag. It is rather used to test the designs, and indirectly the manufacturing processes.

For many electronics products, heat cycling is a standard durability test method. Also, drop tests, pressure tests, tumble tests, and shear tests are frequently used. For smart labels, the default test method is bend testing. The need for bend testing comes from the typical smart label failure methods.

The two most likely points to fail in smart labels are chip bonding and the edges of the IC. Bend testing is a way to verify the sufficient durability of both of these possible failure points.

Test method

At the beginning of the test, a baseline performance needs to be measured. The baseline performance of the sample set consists of the threshold sweep result of each of the tags in the sample. The threshold sweeps can be done with Voyantic Tagsurance® devices. The curves describe how much power is needed for waking up the tags at different frequencies.

Threshold sweeps of 98 pieces of RAIN RFID inlays before the durability testing

After the baseline test, stress is applied to the tags, and then the tag performance is tested again.

This cycle of test rounds and stressing the labels are repeated until a targeted performance decrease has been reached. The more test rounds an inlay (label) survives, the better is the durability test result aka durability rating.

Threshold sweeps of 98 pieces of RAIN RFID inlays after several rounds of stressing

The test method document describes the details of the test parameters and stress parameters.

Download the detailed standard test method description

Special tags

There are some special tags where bend testing is not (the only) relevant durability test method. For example, aerospace tags are tested according to the SAE AS5678 standard, which defines environmental conditions such as temperatures, vibration, etc., which the tag must sustain. With these standards, the tag is stressed with vibration and extreme temperatures instead of the typical bend testing, which is designed to highlight the common failure methods of cracked bonding and cracked ICs.

The same test principles can also be combined with other durability testing methods. For example, laundry tags could be tested using ISO15797 standard, which defines how garments are stressed with washing cycles. The idea is the same: to find out whether the tag performance decreases too much when stress is applied.

Also, specialty tags that are intended to be used in extreme conditions, exposed to heat, cold, or chemicals, should be tested in combination with applicable stress methods. IEC60068-2 standards (environmental testing of electronics products) provide help for these. IEC60068-2-2 (dry heat) and IEC60068-2-14 (temperature variation) are likely useful methods, and both can be combined with Tagsurance testing. The IEC60068 family also includes test methods for different mechanical stress types, chemicals, humidity, and so on.

In these special tag durability tests the RFID testing, both baseline and the test after stress, can be made with Tagsurance® systems. Between the RF tests, different stress is applied with the Voyantic Bendurance machine.

Voyantic Bendurance™

How durable is good?

An obvious question related to durability testing is: How durable is durable enough? Or: How durable is good and what is not good enough?

There is no clear answer to these excellent questions. Laundry standard ISO15797 has its criteria and a way to define what is durable enough. SAE AS5678 similarly has its criteria for aerospace tags. But those criteria cannot be extended to other use cases and tag types.

One answer could be: Durable enough is when a smart label survives its intended life cycle. That answer does not help in practice.

Another way is to look at comparison data. It doesn’t give a simple answer but probably helps in practice. If an inlay is as durable as others, most likely it is durable enough. And on the other hand, if an inlay is less durable than a typical inlay, a closer look should be taken, and possibly an improvement is needed.

Comparison data in mind we tested some dry inlays with the following results.

Change of dry inlay yield after each test round

There were significant differences in the dry inlay durability. With the weakest dry inlay model, over 90 % of the inlays broke beyond specified performance with the first test round. The strongest inlays survived more than 10 stress rounds.

  • About 20 % of the dry inlays got a durability rating of 1-3
  • About 60 % of the dry inlays got a durability rating of 4-9
  • And about 20 % of the dry inlays got a durability rating of 10 or higher
  • Median durability rate for all the tested dry inlays was 4, and average about 5.5

This suggests that dry inlay durability could be considered typical if the durability rating is between 4 and 9.

Summary

Faster manufacturing machines and new materials have increased the need for testing the durability of RAIN RFID and NFC inlays.

Voyantic Bendurance is a durability test system focusing on bending, the typical failure mechanism of the inlays. Bendurance with its standard test method gives comparable durability data of the inlays.

A similar approach can also be used with other durability testing such as the SAE AS5678 test for aerospace tags, ISO15797 tests for laundry tags and tags integrated into apparel, and IEC60068-2 for durability against extreme temperatures, other types of mechanical stress, chemicals, and so on.

Download the standard test method description

Request a Bendurance demo

Request a durability test system quotation

All blog posts
All blog posts

Analysis of the Cost of RFID Quality – And How (Not) to Lose a Customer

May 03, 2021

We hosted a webinar on managing quality in RAIN RFID and NFC manufacturing. During the session, industry experts shared their views on setting quality goals, on the relevant standards, and on best practices for quality testing through case examples and practical tips. While veterans in RFID quality testing recognize the need for it to achieve excellent and consistent quality, for many less experienced in the field, it can be puzzling to justify the investment for the required RFID test equipment.

With this in mind, it is worthwhile to explore whether the cost of good quality in the context of RFID is justifiable. In an earlier blog post, we discussed optimizing the cost of quality. In this post, we give an example analysis of RFID quality costs.

Analysis of the Cost of RFID Quality

Typically, the three main process steps in smart label manufacturing are chip attach, converting, and personalization. While the process details are specific to the manufacturer and machine, the analysis methods are universal:

  • Failure analysis: What is the impact of possible machine failures?
  • Process analysis: How do quality defects impact the process?
  • Cost analysis: What is the cost of quality defects?
Three main processes in smart label manufacturing

To remain in scope, our example analysis focuses on the cost impact of non-performing RFID tags in production. The case analysis is inspired by the case study presented by our customer Lab ID in our previous webinar session. In our modified case example, we are tasked with the delivery of 1 million labels to a customer. Let us assume that our manufacturing process has a yield of 98%. Out of the 1 million produced tags, 2% would be non-performing, meaning that these tags are bad quality or out of specification. Confronted with this reality, there are three possible actions to address non-performing tags which are described in the picture below.

Different scenarios that can play out based on the action taken to address quality testing and deal with bad tags

The first one is the baseline scenario for the case. We assume that cost and sell price per tag are 0.08 and 0.1, respectively. This leaves us with a margin of 20% for this production lot. In this scenario, we do not take into account any potential cost impact of 2% non-performing tags.

Base scenario – 2% of tags are non-performing

In the next scenario, we ride our luck and deliver all tags without addressing the bad ones. Thankfully, the customer does not notice any defects this time. While the 2% of non-performing tags did not have any repercussions on our margins, the last two scenarios showcase how repeating the action might bite us back the next time. We also do not consider the implications of how the bad tags will inevitably affect our customer’s business.

We get lucky – customer does not notice delivered bad tags

We can also do something about the bad tags. In the third scenario, we decide to test our tags and mark the bad ones during production. This would incur costs in the form of initial tester investment (a capital expenditure that is omitted from the costs of this single production lot) and marker ink (a largely negligible running cost). Marking the tags does not introduce extra production processes or require an operator to supervise the machine. With the help of the tester, we are able to mark the non-performing tags out of the 1 million. This sees our margins decrease slightly (20% to 18%) as we do not charge the customer for the bad tags.

Alternatively, we can also decide to test and then remove bad tags during production. Aside from the initial equipment investment as with the previous scenario, this also requires additional steps in the production, e.g. by handling non-performing tags with a splicing table and changing them to a normal one. This process also requires an operator overseeing the production process which induces additional costs. For our analysis, we assume this removal of a bad tag is ten times the normal cost of producing a tag. This would add a somewhat significant cost to us but our margins remain positive at 2%. Worth considering in this scenario is customers’ willingness to pay more for rolls with 100% working tags. This could help offset the extra costs associated with tag removal.

Testing tags – in both scenarios we can achieve a positive margin

Next, we deliver all tags, 98% good and 2% bad. This time neglecting quality has consequences: the customer notices defects in our delivery, returns the lot, and demands we rework them to reach the promised quality. This requires us to find the non-performing tags from the lot and replace them with good-quality ones. For our analysis, we assume all that tag replacement hassle along with the changes to production planning costs us 25 times the normal cost of producing a tag. Not only have our margins turned negative, but we also need to deal with an annoyed customer whose plans have been disrupted.

Final two scenarios – not testing tags can have grave financial and reputational consequences

In the final “doomsday” scenario, after delivering the production lot, the customer detects the defects, simply returns the lot, and stops doing business with us. Revenue for this production lot has been lost, our customer relationship is severely damaged and our reputation as a tag manufacturer is also at risk. Not addressing quality issues and providing no quantifying proof of quality can have severe consequences. As shown, a single batch of tags mixed some with inferior quality can do much more harm than expected.

Loss of customer relationships is difficult to measure in costs

Being able to quantify quality puts tag producers in a superior position to win and establish trust with customers. Getting there requires effort but as shown in our example it is a worthwhile pursuit in the long run. We are happy to help with your needs in getting there. A good resource to start with is our webinar on managing quality in RAIN RFID and NFC manufacturing.

On-Demand Webinar

Quality Management Approaches in RAIN RFID and NFC Manufacturing

All blog posts