Choosing the Right Encoding Method in Large-Scale RAIN RFID Tag Production

Encoding influences the total cost, speed, and efficiency across the entire RAIN RFID tag value chain, from manufacturing to the end customer. In this post, we look at the most common encoding methods, compare desktop printers with inline systems, and break down how their ROI differs as production volumes grow.

Encoding, or personalization, is a crucial step in the RAIN RFID value chain, as it provides the tag with the meaningful data required for its intended use. It allows the tagged item to be synchronized with systems like inventory management, unlocking countless use cases where users can identify, locate, authenticate, and interact with each item. Therefore, the majority of the tags are encoded before they are shipped out, or the label is applied.

Although personalization is essential for the end use, encoding can often be an inefficient or costly step in the workflow.

The Costs of Label Encoding

There are some finishing lines for the personalization, and for many, desktop RAIN RFID printers have served — and continue to serve — well for encoding. The printers offer low initial investment costs, ease of use, and are sufficient for small batches.

However, these systems don’t scale. Their limitations become apparent as production volumes grow or complexity increases. Many of the finishing line systems are self-made or one-off (few off) systems from miscellaneous suppliers. Less-than-perfect systems and processes introduce delays, raise per-label costs, and increase the risk of errors.

Ultimately, you’re paying not just for the hardware, but also for operator time — and, in the worst case, for material waste and quality issues.

Real cost of encoding:

• Hardware
• Operator time
• Unplanned downtime
• Waste
• Errors

Personalization can take place at several different stages of the value chain

Traditionally, personalization occurs in the final stages of RAIN RFID tag production, just before the tag is applied to its end-use item. In some cases, the inlay manufacturer handles encoding, selling inlays with customer-specific data already embedded. Label converters may encode and sell labels that already contain customer data.

RAIN RFID labels can also be encoded by service bureaus specializing in data management and encoding. End users may choose to purchase blank labels and perform encoding in-house. In addition, various intermediaries — such as system integrators or other service providers — may also handle encoding.

Regardless of who performs the encoding, the key question remains: how to encode in a cost-efficient way.

The comparison: when inline encoding is the better option

Larger machines are needed to address the scalability limitations of desktop printers. Industrial-grade RAIN RFID machines today can produce and encode tags at speeds ranging from 1,000 to over 1,000,000 units per hour. 

But speed alone isn’t the breakthrough. The question is at which point the investment becomes viable. For example, frequently starting and stopping a high-speed machine makes little sense if only small batches are being produced.

We have worked on some comparisons to evaluate the benefits and ROI of the industrial-scale encoding solution. The comparison and the key parameters are shown in the table below.

For short runs and smaller operations, printers still earn their place. Yet when volumes grow, the economics shift: inline encoding outperforms by delivering higher throughput, dramatically lower per-tag costs, and built-in quality assurance. In other words, if you’re preparing for mid to high-volume RFID adoption that meets the quality standards, inline encoding is the strategy that keeps your production efficient — and your business competitive.

Get insights on Tagsurance 3 system with encoding feature in action.

In this on-demand demo webinar, we will walk you through the new system in practice.

Watch now